<< . .

. 29
( : 30)



. . >>

The Cambridge Companion to Kant (New York: Cambridge University Press,
±), pp. ±±“±.
Garve, Friedrich, Gottingscher Gelehrten Anzeiger  (January ±, ±·), °“.
¨
Gibbons, Sarah, Kant™s Theory of Imagination (New York: Oxford University
Press, ±).
Gloy, Karen, Studien zur theoretischen Philosophie Kants (Wurzburg: Konigshausen
¨ ¨
and Neumann, ±°).
Gochnauer, Myron, ˜˜Kant™s Refutation of Idealism,™™ Journal of the History of
Philosophy ± (±·), ±µ“°.
Gram, Moltke S. (ed.), Kant: Disputed Questions (Chicago: Quadrangle Press,
±·).
Guyer, Paul, Kant and the Claims of Knowledge (Cambridge University Press, ±·).
˜˜Placing Myself in Time: Kant™s Third Paralogism,™™ in G. Funke (ed.), Akten
des µten Internationalen Kant-Kongresses (Bonn: Bouvier, ±µ), pp. µ“µ.
˜˜The Transcendental Deduction of the Categories,™™ in P. Guyer (ed.), The
Cambridge Companion to Kant (New York: Cambridge University Press, ±),
pp. ±“±°.
˜˜Kant™s Conception of Empirical Law,™™ Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society,
Supplementary Volume  (±°), ±“.
˜˜Kant on Apperception and A Priori Synthesis,™™ American Philosophical Quarter-
ly ±· (±°), °µ“±.
Review of Identitat und Objektivitat, The Journal of Philosophy · (±·), ±µ±“±·.
¨ ¨
· Bibliography
Guyer, Paul (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant (Cambridge University Press,
±).
Hamann, J. G., Briefwechsel, A. Henkel (ed.) (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, ±).
Harper, William and Ralf Meerbote (eds.), Kant on Causality, Freedom, and
Objectivity (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, ±).
Harrison, Ross, ˜˜Transcendental Arguments and Idealism,™™ in G. Vesey (ed.),
Idealism Past and Present. Royal Institute of Philosophy Lecture Series: ±
(Cambridge University Press, ±).
Hawking, Stephen, A Brief History of Time (New York: Doubleday, ±).
Hawking, Stephen and Brian Ellis, The Large Scale Structure of Spacetime (Cam-
bridge University Press, ±·).
Heidegger, Martin, Being and Time (Tubingen: Max Niemeyer, ±·±).
¨
Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics (Bloomington: University of Indiana Press,
±).
Phanomenologische Interpretation von Kants ˜˜Kritik der reinen Vernunft™™ (Frankfurt:
¨
Klostermann, ±··).
Heidemann, Ingeborg, ˜˜Der Begri¬ der Spontaneitat in der Kritik der reinen
¨
Vernunft,™™ Kant-Studien · (±µµ“±µ), “°.
Heimsoeth, Heinz, ˜˜Arthur Collier und der Durchbruch des neuzeitlichen
Bewußtseinsidealismus,™™ Studien zur Philosophiegeschichte (Koln: Kolner
¨ ¨
Universitatsverlag, ±±).
¨
˜˜Consciousness of Personality and the Thing in Itself in Kant™s Philosophy,™™
in M. Gram (ed.), Kant: Disputed Questions (Chicago: Quadrangle Press,
±·), pp. ·“·.
Henrich, Dieter, The Unity of Reason (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University
Press, ±).
˜˜Die Anfange des Subjekts (±·),™™ in A. Honneth et al. (eds.), Zwischenbet-
¨
rachtungen im Prozeß der Aufklarung (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, ±), pp. ±°“±·°.
¨
˜˜Die Beweisstruktur der transzendentalen Deduktion der reinen Verstan-
desbegri¬e “ eine Diskussion mit Dieter Henrich,™™ in B. Tuschling (ed.),
Probleme der ˜Kritik der reinenVernunft™ (Berlin: De Gruyter, ±), pp. µ“.
˜˜Die Deduktion des Sittengesetzes,™™ in Alexander Schwann (ed.), Denken im
Schatten des Nihilismus (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft,
±·µ), pp. µµ“±±.
˜˜Fichtes ˜Ich,™ ™™ in Selbstverhaltnisse (Stuttgart: Reclam, ±).
¨
˜˜Identity and Objectivity: An Inquiry into Kant™s Transcendental Deduc-
tion,™™ in The Unity of Reason (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press,
±), pp. ±“±°.
˜˜The Identity of the Subject in the Transcendental Deduction™™ in E.
Schaper and W. Vossenkuhl (eds.), Reading Kant (Oxford: Blackwell, ±),
pp. µ°“°.
˜˜Kant™s Notion of a Deduction and the Methodological Background of the
First Critique,™™ in E. Forster (ed.), Kant™s Transcendental Deductions in the Three
¨
Critiques and the Opus Postumum (Stanford University Press, ±), pp. “.
˜˜Noch einmal in Zirkeln,™™ in C. Bellut and U. Muller-Scholl (eds.), Mensch
¨ ¨
·µ
Bibliography
und Moderne (Wurzburg: Konigshausen and Neumann, ±), pp. “±.
¨ ¨
˜˜The Proof Structure of Kant™s Transcendental Deduction,™™ in R. C.
Walker (ed.), Kant on Pure Reason (Oxford University Press, ±), pp.
“±.
˜˜Self-Consciousness, A Critical Introduction to a Theory,™™ Man and World 
(±·±), “.
Ho¬man, Paul, ˜˜The Unity of Descartes™s Man,™™ The Philosophical Review µ
(±).
Hollis, M., ˜˜Times and Spaces,™™ Mind · (±·), µ“µ.
Howell, Robert, Kant™s Transcendental Deduction (Dordrecht: Kluwer, ±).
˜˜Apperception and the ±· Transcendental Deduction,™™ Synthese · (±±),
µ“.
Hudson, Hud, Kant™s Compatibilism (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, ±).
Hume, David, A Treatise of Human Nature, L. E. Selby-Bigge (ed.) (Oxford:
Clarendon Press, ±).
Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, E. Steinberg (ed.) (Indianapolis:
Hackett, ±±).
Jacobi, Friedrich H., David Hume uber den Glauben, oder Idealismus und Realismus, ein
¨
Gesprach (Breslau: Lowe, ±·µ).
¨ ¨
Jolley, Nicholas, ˜˜Leibniz and Phenomenalism,™™ Studia Leibniziana ± (±).
Kalter, Alfons, Kants vierter Paralogismus. Eine entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchung
zum Paralogismenkapitel der ersten Au¬‚age der ˜Kritik der reinen Vernunft™ (Meisen-
heim am Glan: Konigstein, ±·µ).
¨
Keller, Pierre, ˜˜Personal Identity and Kant™s Third Person Perspective,™™ Ideal-
istic Studies  (±), ±“±.
Kemp-Smith, Norman, A Commentary on Kant™s ˜˜Critique of Pure Reason™™ (London:
Macmillan, ±).
Immanuel Kant™s ˜Critique of Pure Reason™ (London: Macmillan, ±).
Kitcher, Patricia Kant™s Transcendental Psychology (New York: Oxford University
Press, ±°).
˜˜Kant™s Real Self,™™ in Allen W. Wood (ed.), Self and Nature in Kant™s Philosophy
(Ithaca: Cornell University Press, ±), pp. ±±“±·.
˜˜Connecting Intuitions and Concepts at B ±°n,™™ Southern Journal of Philosophy
µ (±), Supplement, ±·“±.
˜˜Kant on Self-Identity,™™ The Philosophical Review ± (±), ±“·.
˜˜Kant™s Patchy Epistemology,™™ The Paci¬c Philosophical Quarterly  (±·),
°“±.
Kitcher, Philip, ˜˜Projecting the Order of Nature,™™ in Robert Butts (ed.), Kant™s
Philosophy of Physical Science (Dordrecht: Reidel, ±), pp. ±°“µ.
¨
Kruger, Gerhard, ˜˜Uber Kants Lehre von der Zeit,™™ in Philosophie und Moral in
¨
der Kantischen Kritik (Tubingen: J. C. B. Mohr, ±·), pp. “.
¨
Kruger, Lorenz, ˜˜Wollte Kant die Vollstandigkeit seiner Urteilstafel be-
¨ ¨
weisen?,™™ Kantstudien µ (±), “µµ.
Lachieze-Rey, Pierre, Idealisme kantien (Paris: Vrin, ±·).
` ´
Langston, Douglas, ˜˜The Supposed Incompatibility between Kant™s Refuta-
· Bibliography
tions of Idealism,™™ Southern Journal of Philosophy ±· (±·), µ“.
Larmore, Charles, Review of E. Tugendhat, ˜˜Selbstbewußtsein und Selbstbes-
timmung,™™ The Philosophical Review  (±), ±°“±°.
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm, Logical Papers, G. H. R. Parkinson (ed.) (Oxford:
Clarendon Press, ±).
Mathematische Schriften, C. J. Gerhard (ed.) (Hildesheim: Georg Olms, ±·).
Philosophische Schriften, C. J. Gerhard (ed.) (Hildesheim: Georg Olms, ±·).
Lipps, Theodor, Leitfaden der Psychologie (Leipzig: Engelmann ±°).
˜˜Inhalt und Gegenstand; Psychologie und Logik,™™ in Sitzungsberichte der
philosophischen-philologischen und der historischen Klasse der Koniglichen Bayerischen
¨
Akademie derWissenschaften  (±°µ).
Lipson, Morris, ˜˜On Kant on Space,™™ Paci¬c Philosophical Quarterly · (±),
·“.
Loftus, E. F., ˜˜The Reality of Repressed Memories,™™ American Psychologist 
(±), µ±“µ·.
Longuenesse, Beatrice, Kant et le pouvoir de juger (Paris: Presses Universitaires de
´
France, ±).
Lovejoy, Arthur, ˜˜On Kant™s Reply to Hume,™™ Archiv fur Geschichte der Philosophie
¨
(±°), °“°·.
Mackie, John L., The Cement of the Universe (Oxford University Press, ±·).
Malcolm, Norman, ˜˜Whether ˜I™ is a Referring Expression,™™ in C. Diamond
and J. Teichman (eds.), Intention and Intentionality (Brighton: Harvester
Press, ±·), pp. ±µ“.
Matthews, H. E., ˜˜Strawson on Transcendental Idealism,™™ Philosophical Quarter-
ly ± (±), °“°.
McCann, Edwin, ˜˜Skepticism and Kant™s B-Deduction,™™ History of Philosophy
Quarterly  (±µ), ·±“.
Meerbote, Ralf, ˜˜Kant on the Nondeterminate Character of Human Actions,™™
in W. P. Harper and R. Meerbote (eds.), Kant on Causality, Freedom,
and Objectivity (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, ±), pp.
±“±.
˜˜Kant™s Functionalism,™™ in J.-C. Smith (ed.), Historical Foundations of Cognitive
Science (Dordrecht: Kluwer, ±°).
˜˜Kant™s Refutation of Problematic Material Idealism,™™ in B. den Ouden and
M. Moen (eds.), New Essays on Kant (New York: Peter Lang, ±), pp.
±±±“±µ.
˜˜The Unknowability of Things in Themselves,™™ in L. W. Beck (ed.), Kant™s
Theory of Knowledge (Dordrecht: Reidel, ±·), pp. ±“±·.
Melnick, Arthur, Kant™s Analogies of Experience (University of Chicago Press, ±·).
Space, Time, and Thought in Kant (Dordrecht: Kluwer, ±).
Miller, George W., ˜˜Kant™s First Edition Refutation of Dogmatic Idealism,™™
Kant-Studien  (±·±), “±.
Mischel, Theodore, ˜˜Kant and the Possibility of a Science of Psychology,™™
Monist µ± (±·), µ“.
Mittelstaedt, Peter, Philosophical Problems of Modern Physics (Dordrecht: D. Reidel,
··
Bibliography
±·).
Moore, G.E., ˜˜The Refutation of Idealism,™™ Proceedings of the British Academy µ
(±), ·“°°.
Muller-Lauter, Wolfgang, ˜˜Kants Widerlegung des materialen Idealismus,™™
¨
Archiv fur Geschichte der Philosophie  (±), °“.
¨
Nabert, J., ˜L™experience interne chez Kant,™™ Revue de Metaphysique et de Morale ±
´ ´
(±), °µ“.
Nagel, Gordon, The Structure of Experience ( University of Chicago Press, ±).
Nagel, Thomas, Mortal Questions (Cambridge University Press, ±·).
The View From Nowhere (Oxford University Press, ±).
˜˜Brain Bisection and the Unity of Consciousness,™™ in Mortal Questions (Cam-
bridge University Press, ±·), pp. ±·“±.
˜˜What is it like to be a bat?,™™ in Mortal Questions (Cambridge University Press,
±·), pp. ±µ“±°.
Naragon, S., ˜˜Kant on Descartes and the Brutes,™™ Kant-Studien ± (±°), ±“.
Natorp, Paul, ˜˜Kant und die Marburger Schule,™™ Kant-Studien ±· (±).
Neiman, Susan, The Unity of Reason (New York: Oxford University Press, ±).
Newton-Smith, W. H., The Structure of Time (London: Routledge and Kegan
Paul, ±°).
Nietzsche Friedrich, On the Genealogy of Morals, trans. Walter Kaufmann (New
York: Random House, ±·).
Nolan, J. P., ˜˜Kant on Meaning: Two Studies,™™ Kant-Studien ·° (±·), ±±“±°.
Nozick, Robert, Philosophical Explanations (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univer-
sity Press, ±±).
O™Neill, Onora, ˜˜Space and Objects,™™ The Journal of Philosophy  (±·), “.
Parsons, Charles, Mathematics in Philosophy (Ithaca: Cornell University Press,
±).
˜˜Kant™s Philosophy of Arithmetic,™™ in R. C. S. Walker (ed.), Kant on Pure
Reason (Oxford University Press, ±), pp. ±“°.
˜˜Commentary: Remarks on Pure Natural Science,™™ in Allen Wood (ed.), Self
and Nature in Kant™s Philosophy (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, ±), pp.
±“·.
˜˜The Transcendental Aesthetic,™™ in P. Guyer (ed.), The Cambridge Companion
to Kant (New York: Cambridge University Press, ±), pp. “±°°.
˜˜Arithmetic and the Categories,™™ Topoi  (±), ±°“±±.
˜˜In¬nity and Kant™s Conception of the ˜Possibility of Experience,™™™ The
Philosophical Review · (±), ±“±·.
˜˜Objects and Logic,™™ Monist µ (±), ±“µ±.
Paton, Herbert J., Kant™s Metaphysic of Experience (London: George Allen and
Unwin, ±).
Patten, S. C., ˜˜An Anti-Skeptical Argument at the Deduction,™™ Kant-Studien ·
(±·), µµ°“µ.
Perrini, Paolo (ed.), Kant and Contemporary Epistemology (Dordrecht: Kluwer,
±).
Pippin, Robert, Hegel™s Idealism: The Satisfactions of Self-Consciousness (New York:
· Bibliography
Cambridge University Press, ±).
Kant™s Theory of Form (New Haven: Yale University Press, ±).
˜˜Kant on the Spontaneity of Mind,™™ Canadian Journal of Philosophy ±· (±·),
“·.
Pistorius, A., ˜˜Review of Kant™s Prolegomena zu einer jeden kunftigen Metaphysik,™™
¨
Allgemeine Deutsche Bibliothek µ (±·), “µ·.
Plaass, Peter, Kant™s Theory of Natural Science, trans. A. and M. Miller (Dordrecht:
Kluwer, ±).
Porter, Lindsay, ˜˜Does the Transcendental Deduction Contain a Refutation of
Idealism?,™™ Kant-Studien · (±), ·“.
¨
Pothast, Ulrich, Uber einige Probleme der Selbstbeziehung (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp,
±·±).
Powell, C. Thomas, Kant™s Theory of Self-Consciousness (New York: Oxford Uni-
versity Press, ±°).
Prauss, Gerold, Erscheinung bei Kant (Berlin: De Gruyter, ±·±).
Kant und das Problem der Dinge an sich (Bonn: Bouvier, ±·).
Pritchard, H. A., Kant™s Theory of Knowledge (Oxford: Clarendon Press, ±°±).
Quinton, Anthony, ˜˜Spaces and Times,™™ Philosophy · (±), ±°“±·.
Rademacher, Franz, ˜˜Kants Lehre vom innern Sinn in der ˜Kritik der reinen
Vernunft,™™™ Kant-Studien, Erganzungshefte  (±°), ±“µ.
¨
Reich, Klaus, The Completeness of Kant™s Table of Judgments, trans J. Kneller and M.
Losonsky (Palo Alto: Stanford University Press, ±).
Rickert, Heinrich, Der Gegenstand der Erkenntnis (Tubingen: Mohr, ±).
¨
Robinson, Hoke, ˜˜Intuition and Manifold in the Transcendental Deduction,™™
Southern Journal of Philosophy  (±), °“±.
Robinson, Lewis, ˜˜Contributions a l™histoire de l™evolution philosophique de
` ´
Kant,™™ Revue de metaphysique et de Morale ± (±), “µ.
´
¨ ber Sinn und Sinnlosigkeit von Kants Theorie der Subjek-
Rohs, Peter, ˜˜U
tivitat,™™ Neue Hefte fur Philosophie ·/ (±), µ“°.
¨ ¨
Rorty, Richard, ˜˜Strawson™s Objectivity Argument,™™ Review of Metaphysics 
(±·°), °“.
Rosenberg, Jay, The Thinking Self (Philadelphia: Temple University Press,
±).
˜˜I Think: Some Re¬‚ections on Kant™s Paralogisms,™™ Midwest Studies in
Philosophy ±° (±), µ°“µ.
Sche¬el, Dieter, ˜˜Der Anfang der transzendentalen Deduktion im Falle der
Kategorie der Substanz,™™ in G. Funke (ed.), Akten des funften Internationalen
¨
Kant-Kongresses (Bonn: Bouvier, ±µ), pp. “°±.
¨
Schopenhauer, Arthur, Uber die vierfache Wurzel vom zureichenden Grund, in Kleinere
Schriften: Samtliche Werke III (Frankfurt: Cotta-Insel, ±).
¨
Sellars, Wilfrid, Science and Metaphysics: Variations on Kantian Themes (London:
Routledge and Kegan Paul, ±).
˜˜Kant™s Transcendental Idealism,™™ in P. Laberge (ed.), Proceedings of the
Ottawa Congress on Kant (University of Ottawa Press, ±·), pp. ±µ“±±.
˜˜Metaphysics and the Concept of a Person,™™ in Karel Lambert (ed.), The Logical
·
Bibliography
Way of Doing Things (New Haven: Yale University Press, ±), pp. ±“
.
˜˜This I or he, or it (the thing) which thinks,™™ Proceedings and Addresses of the
American Philosophical Association  (±·±), µ“±.
Shoemaker, Sydney, Self-Knowledge and Self-Identity (Ithaca: Cornell University
Press, ±).
˜˜Commentary: Self-Consciousness and Synthesis,™™ in Allen W. Wood (ed.),
Self and Nature in Kant™s Philosophy (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, ±),
pp. ±“±µ.
˜˜Persons and their Pasts,™™ in Identity, Cause, and Mind (New York: Cambridge
University Press, ±), pp. ±“.
˜˜Self-Reference and Self-Awareness,™™ The Journal of Philosophy µ (±),
µµµ“µ·.
Skorpen, Erling, ˜˜Kant™s Refutation of Idealism,™™ Journal of the History of
Philosophy  (±), “.
Sommers, Fred, The Logic of Natural Language (Oxford: Clarendon Press, ±).
Strawson, Peter F., Persons: An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics (London: Methuen,
±µ).
The Bounds of Sense: An Essay on Kant™s ˜Critique of Pure Reason™ (London:
Methuen, ±).
Stroud, Barry, The Signi¬cance of Philosophical Skepticism (Oxford: Clarendon
Press, ±).
˜˜Kant and Skepticism,™™ in M. Burnyeat (ed.), The Skeptical Tradition (Ber-
keley: University of California Press, ±), pp. ±“.
˜˜Transcendental Arguments,™™ Journal of Philosophy µ (±), ±“µ.
Stuhlmann-Laeisz, Rainer, ˜˜Kants Thesen uber sein Kategoriensystem und
¨
ihre Beweise,™™ Kant-Studien ·· (±), µ“.
Sturma, Dieter, Kant uber Selbstbewußtsein (Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlag,
¨
±µ).
Swinburne, Richard, Space and Time (London: Macmillan, ±).
˜˜Time,™™ Analysis  (±µ), ±“±±.
Tenbruck, Friedrich, ˜˜Die transzendentale Deduktion der Kategorien nach
der zweiten Au¬‚age der ˜Kritik der reinen Vernunft™™™ (Marburg: Disserta-
tion, ±).
Thole, Bernhard, Kant und die Gesetzmaßigkeit der Natur (Berlin: De Gruyter, ±±).
¨
¨
˜˜Die Beweisstruktur der transzendentalen Deduktion in der zweiten Au¬‚age
der ˜Kritik der reinen Vernunft,™™™ in G. Funke (ed.), Akten des µten Internatio-
nalen Kant-Kongresses .-. April ±± (Bonn: Bouvier, ±±), pp. °“±.
Thompson, Manley, ˜˜Epistemic Priority, Analytic Truth, and Naturalized
Epistemology,™™ American Philosophical Quarterly ± (±±), ±“±.
Thomson, Anton, ˜˜Bemerkungen zur Kritik des Kantischen Begri¬s des
Dinges an sich,™™ Kant-Studien  (±°), “µ·.
Tugendhat, Ernst, Self-Consciousness and Self-Determination (Cambridge, Mass.:
MIT Press, ±).
Vaihinger, Hans, Commentar zu ˜Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft™ (Stuttgart: Union
° Bibliography
Deutsche Verlagsgesellschaft, ±).
˜˜Die transzendentale Deduktion in der ersten Au¬‚age der Kritik der reinen
Vernunft,™™ in Abhandlungen (Halle: ±°).
˜˜Zu Kants Widerlegung des Idealismus,™™ Strassburger Abhandlungen zur Philos-
ophie (Tubingen: J. C. B. Mohr, ±), pp. ·“±.
¨
Van Cleve, James, ˜˜Substance, Matter, and Kant™s First Analogy,™™ Kant-Studien
·° (±·), ±“±±.
˜˜Four Recent Interpretations of Kant™s Second Analogy,™™ Kant-Studien 
(±·), “·.
Vleeschauwer, Hermann J. de, La Deduction transcendentale dans l™“uvre de Kant
´
(Antwerp: De Sikkel, ±·).
Wagner, Hans, ˜˜Der Argumentationsgang in Kants Deduktion der
Kategorien,™™ Kant-Studien ·± (±°), “.
Walker, Ralph C. S., Kant (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, ±·).
˜˜The Status of Kant™s Theory of Matter,™™ in L. W. Beck (ed.), Kant™s Theory of
Knowledge (Dordrecht: Reidel, ±·), pp. ±µ±“±µ.
˜˜Review of Identitat und Objektivitat,™™ Grazer Philosophische Studien  (±··), ±“
¨ ¨
±·.
Walker, Ralph C. S.,(ed.), The Real in the Ideal (New York: Garland, ±).
Walsh, W. H., Kant™s Criticism of Metaphysics (Edinburgh University Press, ±·).
Waxman, Wayne, Kant™s Model of the Mind (New York: Oxford University Press,
±±).
Weizsacker, Carl Friedrich von, ˜˜Kant™s ˜First Analogy of Experience™ and
¨
Conservation Principles of Physics,™™ Synthese  (±·±), ·µ“µ.
Weldon, D., Kant™s ˜Critique of Pure Reason™ (Oxford: Clarendon Press, ±µ).
Weyl, Hermann, Philosophie der Mathematik und Naturwissenschaft (Darmstadt:
Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, ±).
Whitehead, Alfred North, An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Natural Knowledge
(Cambridge University Press, ±±).
Science in the Modern World (Cambridge University Press, ±).
Wilkerson, Terence, ˜˜Kant on Self-Consciousness,™™ Philosophical Quarterly °
(±°), ·“°.
Williams, Bernard, Descartes: The Project of Pure Enquiry (Atlantic Highlands, N.J.:
Humanities Press, ±·).
˜˜Imagination and the Self,™™ in Problems of the Self (Cambridge University
Press, ±·), pp. °“µ.
˜˜Wittgenstein and Idealism,™™ in G. Vesey (ed.), Understanding Wittgenstein.
Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures  (New York: St. Martin™s Press,
±·).
˜˜Knowledge and Meaning in the Philosophy of Mind,™™ Philosophical Review ··
(±), ±“.
Wilson, Margaret. ˜˜On Kant and the Refutation of Subjectivism,™™ in L. W.
Beck (ed.), Kant™s Theory of Knowledge (Dordrecht: Reidel, ±·), pp. °“±·.
˜˜Leibniz and Materialism,™™ Canadian Journal of Philosophy (±·), µ“µ±.
˜˜Leibniz, Self-Consciousness and Immortality: In the Paris Notes and
±
Bibliography
After,™™ Archiv fur Geschichte der Philosophie, Sonderheft µ (±·), µ“µ.
¨
Wol¬, Michael, Die Vollstandigkeit von Kants Urteilstafel (Frankfurt: Klostermann,
¨
±µ).
Wol¬, Robert Paul, Kant™s Theory of Mental Activity (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard
University Press, ±).
˜˜Kant™s Debt to Hume via Beattie,™™ Journal of the History of Ideas ± (±°),
±±·“±.
Wood, Allen, Kant™s Moral Religion (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, ±·°).
˜˜Kant™s Compatibilism,™™ in A. Wood (ed.), Self and Nature in Kant™s Philosophy
(Ithaca: Cornell University Press, ±), pp. ·“±°±.
Wood, Allen (ed.), Self and Nature in Kant™s Philosophy (Ithaca: Cornell University
Press, ±).

<< . .

. 29
( : 30)



. . >>