<< . .

. 29
( : 30)



. . >>

Wilkerson, T. E., ˜Transcendental Arguments™, Philosophical Quarterly ° (±·°),
°°“±.
Will, Frederic, ˜Blake™s Quarrel with Reynolds™, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art
Criticism ±µ (±µ·), °“.
Williams, Bernard, Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy, Fontana/Collins, ±µ,
p. ±±.
Williams, Michael, Unnatural Doubts, Oxford: Blackwell, ±.
Williams, Raymond, Culture and Society ±·°“±µ°, London: Chatto and Windus
Ltd, ±·.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, On Certainty, trans. Denis Paul and G. E. M. Anscombe,
eds. G. E. M. Anscombe and G. H. von Wright, Oxford: Basil Blackwell,
±.
Philosophical Investigations, nd edn, trans. G. E. M. Anscombe, Oxford:
Blackwell, ±µ.
Wittkower, Rudolf, ˜Genius: Individualism in Art and Artists™, Wiener, Dictionary,
vol. © ©, ·“±.
Wolff, Robert Paul, Kant™s Theory of Mental Activity, Harvard University Press,
±.
Wood, Barry, ˜The Growth of the Soul: Coleridge™s Dialectical Method and the
Strategy of Emerson™s Nature,™ PMLA ±. (±·), µ“·.
Wu, Duncan, Wordsworth™s Reading ±··°“±·, Cambridge University Press,
±.
Wordsworth™s Reading ±°°“±±µ , Cambridge University Press, ±.
Index




Abrams, M. H., , , ° Bacon, Francis, °“±, °, ±
absolute will, ±·, ±°, ±± Barrell, John, ·
abstraction, ± Barresi, John, 
and Stewart, µ Bate, Jonathan, ±°, 
in Berkeley, ±±°“±± Beattie, James, µ, 
in Hazlitt, , ±°, ±°, ±±°“±, ±, ±“µ, beauty, ±, ±, µ, µ, ·, ±°, ±°·
±µ“, ±, ±±, ±. See also Hazlitt in Coleridge, ±µ, ±
in Hume, ±±° in Kant, ±
in Locke, ±±° Bentham, Jeremy, , ·, , µ
acceptance / acknowledgement, ±, ·, ±, Berkeley, George, ±°“±±
±·, ± Berlin, Isaiah, ·
Addison, Joseph, µ, ±,  Bewell, Alan, ·, °
Albrecht, W. P., ±°µ Bloom, Harold, ±
Alison, Archibald, ·“ Bollingbroke, Lord. See St. John
anti-Caledonianism, ·,  Bonjour, Lawrence, ±µ
appearance, ±± Bourke, Richard, ±
in Kant, ±·° Bowie, Andrew, ±, ±, ±·
argument, , , , ±, , , ±µ, ±·±, ±°, ±±, Bromwich, David, ±
±, ± Burke, Edmund, “µ, ·, , , ±°·, µ
in Wordsworth, , µ, ±° Burnett, James, 
repression of, ±, ±µ, ·, ±°
transcendental, ±, ·°, ±±µ“±·, ±±, ±, Campbell, George, µ, µµ
±, ±µ“, ±µ°, ±µ“, ±·, ±·, ±, Carnap, Rudolf, ±µ°, ±µ±
°, ±, µ, µ. See also Coleridge; causation
and justi¬cation, ±°, ±, ±µ·
Kant
association, µ°“µ, ±, ±°, ±, in Hume, ±±°
±° Cavell, Stanley, ±, ±·, ±, ·, ±, ±
and Coleridge, ±, ± Chandler, James, ·
in Alison, · Chisholm, Roderick, , ±µ
in Gerard,  Christensen, Jerome, ±
in Hazlitt, ±“°, ± cogito, 
in Hobbes, µ· Coleridge, Samuel Taylor, , ±, ±µ, ±, ·°,
in Hume, °, °, ±±± ·±, , ±°, ±, ±·, ±“°·, ±±, ±,
in Locke,  µµ
in Tucker, ± Aids to Re¬‚ection, , ±·, ±, ±, °“
in Wordsworth, , “° and desynonymy, °
autonomy, aesthetic, , , ··, · and dialectic, ±µ, ±“·µ, °±“
in Coleridge, ±·± and faith, ±µ
in Hazlitt, ±· and rationalism, ±µ“
Ayer, A. J., ±µ± and transcendental argument, ±µ“,
Ayers, Michael, ° ±µ“

·
·
Index
and voluntarism, ±µ, ±“°° Descartes, Ren´ , ±
e
Biographia Literaria, , , ±, ±, ±µ“, ±°, Dewey, John, ±
± dialectic, ±, ±·, ±µ, ±µ
and hermeneutics, ±
˜Essays on the Principles of Genial
Criticism™, ±“· in Coleridge, ±µµ, ±··, ±·, ±·, ±°, ±±,
Lectures on Literature, ±µ ±, ±, ±µ, °°, ±, µµ
Lectures on Philosophy, ±·, ±µ, ±, ±“°° in Fichte, ±, °, µ
Logic, ±µ, ±, ±·, °, ±±“± in Hegel, µ
˜On Poesy or Art™, ± in Levinson, ±
Statesman™s Manual, ±, ±· in Wordsworth, ·, ·, °, °, , ±°, ±°,
Table Talk, µµ ±
The Friend (±±), ±, ±“·µ, ±°, ± Dicker, Georges, 
commodi¬cation, , · disinterestedness, ±°·
commonsensism, , , ±° in Coleridge, ±
in Hazlitt, , ±“µ, ±°, ±, ±, ±·, in Hazlitt, ±±µ, ±±, ±±·, ±°
±° in Kant, ±
in Hume,  doubleness, Romantic, ±, ±, ·
in Reid, “µ°, , ±° Dryden, John, µ, °
in Shaftesbury, , · Duff, William, “µ
confrontation vs. conversation, , ±±, ±,
±, ° Eagleton, Terry, 
contingency, , , , ±°±, ±, ± egoism, ±±, ±±·
Cooke, Michael, ,  Elridge, Richard, ±, ±, , µ°, ·, , ±µ
Cooper, Anthony Ashley, , ±, , , , empiricism, , ±°, ±, ±µ, °, , ·“µ, , µ°,
· µ, µµ, ±, , ·±, ±, ±µ, ±°
copyright law, · and association. See association
corpuscularianism, ±°, ±±° and Coleridge, ±µ, ±, ±, ±, ±,
creation / creativity, “±±, ±, ±µ, , , ·, , ±·, ±·, ±, ±, ±, ±µ, °, °µ,
, °, ±, , , , ·, ·, ··, ±µ°, ±µ, ±±, ±
±, ±° and commonsensism. See commonsensism
and Stewart, µ and inner sense. See sense, inner
in Burke, , µ and logical positivism, ·, , ±µ±
in Coleridge, ±µ, ±, ±·, ±µ°, ±µµ, ±µ, and representative realism, ·, , °, ,
±µ, ±µ, ±·, ±·µ, ±°, ±µ, ±, ±, ±°, , 
±±, ±, ±, ±, ±·, °±, °, °µ, °, in Burke, µ, 
°·, ±±, ± in Hazlitt, ±°µ, ±°, ±°·, ±°, ±°, ±±, ±±,
in Hazlitt, , ±°µ, ±°·, ±°, ±±, ±±, ±°, ±±, ±±, ±°, ±±, ±, ±, ±°, ±±, ±,
±µ, ±°, ±±, ±, ±µ, ±, ±, ±±, ± ±, ±·, ±, ±°, ±
in Kant, ±µ°, ±·, ±°, ±µ in Hazlitt and Wordsworth, µ“·
in Quine, ·µ in Wordsworth, ·, ·, ··, °, , µ, ,
in Reid,  ±°°, ±°±, ±°, ±°, ±±
in Wittgenstein, ± Engell, James, ±µ, 
in Wordsworth, , ·±, ·, ··“°, ±, , ·, epistemology, ±, , µ, , ±µ, ±, ±, °, , ·,
, µ, , ±°°, ±°±, ±°, ±± , ·°, ·µ, ··, µ, ±°, ±µ±, ±, ±, ±,
°·, ±
Romantic vs. eighteenth-century theories of,
·, µ,  death of, ±±
in Coleridge, ±·, ±, °·
D™Israeli, Isaac, · in Hazlitt, ±°, ±±, ±°, ±°, ±±
Davenant, William, µ in Spinoza, ±
Davidson, Donald, µ, , ±±, ±±, ±µ, ± in Wordsworth, , ±°
De Paolo, Charles, 
De Quincey, Thomas, ±°, ±±, ±°± faith, ±·
deconstruction, ±±, , ±±·, ±± in Bacon, ±
Dennis, John, , , µµ, µµ in Coleridge, ±, ±µ, ±··, ±·, ±°, ±, ±,
Derrida, Jacques, ±± ±, ±·, °·
· Index
Hartley, David, µ°“µ, ±·, ±, ±, ±±
faith (cont.)
in Jacobi, ±·, , ±µ, ±, ±±, ±° Hartman, Geoffrey, , ·, ·
in Kant, ± Hazlitt, William, , , ·°, , ±±, ±°µ“,
in Wordsworth, , · ±µ, ±, °
Ferguson, Adam, µ, µ on Madame de Sta¨ l, ±±“±, ±
e
Ferguson, Francis, · ˜Mind and Motive™, ±, ±·
Fichte, J. G., ±, ±·±, ±, ±, ±, ° ˜On Abstract Ideas™, ±±
¬guration, , ±±“±, ±µ, ·, , µ, ±µ, ±µ, ˜On Genius and Common Sense™, ±, ±,
±µ, ±±, ± ±, ±, ±
in Hazlitt, ±°· on Locke™s Essay, ±±
Fischer, Michael,  ˜On Novelty and Familiarity™, ±°
Fogelin, Robert,  ˜On Poetry in General™, ±·, ±
formalism, ±·° ˜On Reason and the Imagination™, ±,
foundationalism, , µ, , ±µ, ±, ±, °, , , ±
, ·°, ·±, ··, ±, ±µ, ±µ, ±±, ±µ, °, ˜On the Pleasure of Painting™, ±
±, ± ˜On the Prose Style of Poets™, ±, ±°·
and coherentism, , , ±µ, ±··, ±, ° ˜On the Question whether Pope was a Poet™,
and Dewey, °· ±µ
in Coleridge, ±·, ±·, ±, ±°, °, °, ˜Originality™, ±°, ±
°, ° ˜Paragraphs on Prejudice™, ±°
in Hazlitt, ±±, ±±, ±±·, ±, ±, ±, ±, ˜Prejudice™, ±, ±°
±±, ± ˜Remarks on the Systems of Hartley and
in Kant, ±·, ±± Helvetius™, ±±·, ±“
in Reid,  on Shelley™s Posthumous Poems, ±
in Wordsworth, ·, °, , °, ±°°, ±°± ˜The Indian Jugglers™, ±µ
justi¬catory and epistemic, “ ˜The Spirit of Philosophy™, ±°
and abstraction, , ±°“°
Kantian. See Kant
Frege, Gottlob, ±, ±µ± and association, ±“°
Fulford, Tim, ° and commonsensism, , ±“
and faculty psychology, ±°“
genius, , , , °, , , , , µ“·°, and immanent idealism, ±°, ±±, ±, ±°,
±°°, ±°, µµ, µ ±·
and imitation, µ“µ and innatism, ±°“
and innatism, µ·“µ and intuition, ±“°
and invention, µ“ and Kant, ±“
and originality, µ and power, ±°“, ±°“
in Addison, µ and practical reason, ±±“±
in Coleridge, ±µµ, ±·, ±µ and prejudice, ±“°
in Hazlitt, ±“°, ± and transcendental argument, ±±µ“±·, ±±
in Kant, ±·, ±·°, ±µ, ±° Essay, ·, ±°·, ±±µ“±·, ±, ±µ
in Reid,  Grammar, ±±“±µ
in Wordsworth, ·, ±, °, µ, , ±°°, Lectures on English Philosophy, ±±
±°± on art and originality, ±“°
Scottish, “ on painting, ±±“°, ±
Gerard, Alexander, , µ, µ, “µ, , ±, Preface, Light of Nature Pursued, ±±, ±,
± ±
and Kant,  Prospectus, , ±°, ±±, ±·, ±±, ±
Grayling, A. C., ±± Hegel, G. W. F., µ, ±, ±·±, ±·, ±·µ, ±··, ±°,
Guyer, Paul, ±°, ±±, ±,  ±±, ±µ, °±, °, °µ, °, µ
Heidegger, Martin, ±
habit, µ, °, ±°· Hipple, Walter, Jr., µ
in Hazlitt, ±±·, ± Hobbes, Thomas, “, °, µ
in Wordsworth,  Hodgson, John, 
Hamilton, Paul,  Home, Henry, µ
·µ
Index
Hume, David, , µ, , ±, , , °“, , innatism, , ·°, µ
µ“µ, ·, °, , ±±°, ±, ±, ±µ, ±±, and Hazlitt, ±°“
±, ±·µ, ±··, °±, ±°, ± inspiration, ·“·, µ, ±°
Enquiries, µ, ° in Bacon, °“±
Treatise, “±, µ±, , ±· in Puttenham, ·“, 
Humean / inhuman, ·, , °, ± in Shaftesbury, ±“
Hume™s Fork, , ±, ±±, ±µ°, ±µ± in Sidney, “°
and fact / value division, , , µ, ±±, ±, ±·, in Wordsworth, 
, °“, , , ·±, ·“··, ·, , , intuition, µ, ±µ°, ±, ±·, ±°, ±
±°±, ±°·, ±°, ±±µ, ±, ±, ±µ, ±µ±, ±µ, in Coleridge, ±°
±·, ±·µ, °, ± in Hazlitt, ±±
and meaning, ±± in Kant, ±
Hutcheson, Francis, µ“, µ, ±±µ in Shaftesbury, 
intellectual, ±·, ±µµ, ±µ, ±, ±µ, ±,
±·±, ±·, ±·, ±µ, ±, ±, ±, ±µ,
idealism
absolute, ±°, ±·. See also Coleridge °
invention, °, , , ·
immanent. See Hazlitt
transcendental, ±±µ, ±µ°, ±°, ±±, ±, ±·, in Wordsworth, 
±µ, °° irony, , ±, , ±·, ±·±,
imagination, ·, , ±, , °, , µ, , , in Coleridge, ±·
± in Hume, 
and Johnson, 
and Stewart,  Jacobi, Friedrich Heinrich, µ, , ±·, °, , ·,
in Alison, · ±, ±°, ±µ, ±, ±, °
in Burke,  James, William, ±°, ±, ±±, °·
in Coleridge, ±µ, ±, ±·µ, ±· Jeffrey, Francis, 
in Duff,  Johnson, Samuel, 
in Gerard, , , µ Johnston, Kenneth, ·±
in Hazlitt, ±±, ±±·, ±°“, ±±, ±µ judgement
in Hobbes,  aesthetic, ±, ±·, ±
in Hume, °, ±±°, ±±±, ±± re¬‚ective, ±, ±µ
in Kant, ±·
in Lamb,  Kallich, Martin, µ±
in Reid, ,  Kames, Lord. See Home
in Tucker, ± Kant, Immanuel, ±, ±µ, , µ°, ·°, , ±°, ±°,
in Warton,  ±±µ, ±±, ±±, ±°, ±, ±µ, ±, ±µ, ±µµ,
in Wordsworth, ±“, , ±°, ±µ ±µ·, ±µ, ±°, ±±, ±, ±, ±, ±, ±·°,
imitation, , µ, µ, µ, · ±·±, ±·, ±·, ±°, ±±, ±µ, ±, ±·, ±,
in Burke, µ ±±, ±, ±, ±“°
in Kant, µ· and synthesis a priori, ±“µ
indifference, ±“µ, , ±, ±µ, ±·, ±, °, , , and transcendental argument, ±°“±,
·°, ±, ±µ, ±, ±·, ±, °± ±·“
and knowledge, ±·, , , , , ±°, ±±°, and transcendental idealism, ±°“±
±, ±, ±, ±·, ±µ, ±·, ±± Critique of Judgement, ±·“, ±“·°
and life, , ·, ±, ±µ, , , , , ±, ±µ, Critique of Pure Reason, ±“µ±, ±µ, ±
±, ±, ±µµ, ±µ, ±, ±·µ, ±, ±°, °±, ˜Inaugural Dissertation™, ±
° Prolegomena, ±
and unknowing, µ, ±“±, ±°, ±, °, Katz, Jerrold, ±µ
± Keats, John, ±°, °, ·
in Coleridge, ±“, ±µ, ±·, °, °·, Kinnaird, John, µ
° Kipperman, Mark, µ
in Hazlitt, ±°·, ±°, ±, ±°, ± knowledge by acquaintance / by description,
in Schelling, ° ±±
in Wordsworth, ·, °, , , ·, ±° Kuhn, Thomas, , ±
· Index
Lamb, Charles, ±, ·, ±°, , ·, , °, Orsini, Gian, ±µ
µ· Ouroborous, ±±
Leask, Nigel, ±·
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm, ±, ±µ, ±·, ±, Park, Roy, ±, ±, ·
±·“, ±, µ· Paulin, Tom, ±, ±±µ, ·
Levinson, Marjorie, ±·, ±° Peacock, Thomas Love, 
Locke, John, , , ·“, , µ, °, ±°, ±±°, Perkins, Mary Anne, °, 
±±, ±, µ Perry, Seamus, ±·, 
Lockridge, Laurence,  Pfau, Thomas, , ·, °, ±µµ, ±
logic, global, ±·, ±±“°, ±µ, °± phenomenology, ·, ±, ±, ±
in Schelling, ± philosophy, , µ, ·, , ±°, ±±, ±µ, ±, ±, °, ±,
Lovejoy, A. O., °± , , , ·, , ·±, , ±±, ±, ±·,
Lui, Alan, ± ±±, ±, ±µ, ±, ±·, ±·, ±·µ
Lyotard, Jean-Fran¸ ois,  absolute, ±µ
c
and religion, ±, ±°
MacKinnon, D. M.,  and theosophy, ±·“°
Mahoney, John,  and Wordsworth, ±°°
Marin, Raymond,  Anglophone, , µ, ±, ±“, “µ, ·“·,
materialism, µ, ·± ±µ±
and Hazlitt, ±°·, ±± epistemology, ±·µ
in Hartley, ±·, ± in Wordsworth, ·
McFarland, Thomas, ±µ, ±µ,  moral, , ±, ·, ±°·, ±±±
McGann, Jerome, ° para-, ·, ±°, ±, ±·, ±, ±µ, ±, ±·±,
McKusick, James,  ±·, ±·, ±, °, °, °, ±
McNiece, Gerald, °,  Plato, , , °, ±, ±°
Mill, John Stuart, ·µ, ·, ±± Platonism, , ·, , , °, ±, , ±, ±°,
±µ
Monboddo, Lord. See Burnett, James
More, Henry, µ· pleasure, ±
Mounce, H. O.,  Plotinus, ±·
Muirhead, John, ±·, ° power, ±µ, , , ·, ±µ
Mulvihill, James, · in Burke, µ
in De Quincey, ±°, µµ
Natarajan, Uttara, ±°·, ±±, ±, · in Hazlitt, ±, ±°, ±°·, ±°, ±±±, ±±, ±±, ±±µ,
naturalism, ±µ, , , , ·±, ·, ·, , ±, ±°, ±±, ±, ±°“, ±, ±, ±·, ±,
±, ±µ±, ° ±“, ±
in Hazlitt, ± in Hume, ±°
in Hume, ,  in Reid, , ±
in Quine,  in Wordsworth, °, ·“±°±, ±
in Reid, µ, , , ° Pradhan, S. V., ±°
in Wordsworth,  pragmatism, ±°, ±µ
Naturphilosophie, ±·· prejudice
Neoclassicism, , µ, , °, · in Burke, ·, ±±
New Scepticism, ±µ in Hazlitt, ±, ±“°, 
Nietzsche, Friedrich, µ, ±·µ, · projectivism, ±±
noumena / phenomena, ±±µ, ±, ±µ, ±°, in Hazlitt, ±µ
±, ±·°, ±°, ±, ±·, ±±, ±, °, ° propaedeutic, epistemology as, ±, ±, ±·
prose and poetry, , ±°, ±±, ±, , µ, ±°·, ±°,
organicism, µ, ° ±±, ±, ±°, ±
in Coleridge, µ, , ±µ, ±, ±·, ±·, ±·, psychology, ±, , , , ±°, ±, ±°
±° in Hazlitt, ±°“
in Gerard,  in Kant, ±µ±
in Wordsworth, µ, ± in Quine, ±µ
originality,  public / people, ·, ··“°, ±, ·, µ, , ±°±,
in Hazlitt, ±°, ±“ ±°, ±
in Kant, µ· Puttenham, George, “
··
Index
Quine, W. V., , , ·“·, ±°, ±±, ±µ, ± spontaneity, ·, ·, , ±, °
in Coleridge, ±µ, ±, ±±
Rajan, Tilottama, , ±±, · in Hazlitt, ±±
rationalism, ±, ±µ, ±, ± in Wordsworth, ·µ, °“µ, ±
in Coleridge, ±±“, ± St. John, Henry, µ
in Kant, ±· Stephen, Leslie, ·°
reason, practical, ±µ, ±, ±°, ±, ± Stewart, Dugald, °, µ“, ·°
in Coleridge, ±±“, ±µ“ subject / object, , µ°, ±±, ±, ±, ±µ, ±,
in Hazlitt, ±°·, ±±“±·, ±, ± ±·±, ±·µ, ±, °
in Hume, ±±± subjectivity, 
in Kant, ±µµ, ±µ“, °° in Wordsworth, , ±°, ±°
re¬‚exivity, ±, , ±µ sublime, ±, “, µ, ±°
Reid, Nicholas,  in Alison, , ·
Reid, Thomas, , “µ°, ±°, ±, ±·, ° in Burke, µ“
religion, ±µ, ±, ·, ±µ·, ±·, ±·, ±·, ±°, ±, in Dennis, “
±°, ±±, ° in Wordsworth, ·, , ±°
in Coleridge, µµ synthesis a priori, ±µ, , , ±, ±µ, ±°, ±··,
Reynolds, Joshua, µµ ±·, ±µ, ±·, ±µ, °·
Robertson, Abram,  and Anglophone philosophy, ±µ±“µ
Rorty, Richard, , µ, , ±, ±, , , · in Coleridge, ±±, ±
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques,  in Kant, ±“µ
Russell, Bertrand, ±±
Rymer, Thomas, µµ, ° teleology, ±, ±·, ±, ±µ, °°
and Wordsworth, 
salto mortale, ±, ±µ, ±µ. See also Jacobi Temple, William, °
scepticism, ±, , ·, , ±°, ±, ±, ±, ±·, , , Tooke, John Horne, ±±, ±±
, µ, , ·, , ±±, ±±µ, ±±, ±±·, ±, truth, poetic, ±µ
±, ±, ±, ±µ, ±, ±, ±µ°, ±µµ, ±µ·, in Shaftesbury, 
±±, ±, ±·°, ±·µ, ±·, ±, °, °, ±, in Wordsworth, ±±, , ·±, ·, ·, °, , °,
±, ± , , µ, ±°, ±±
and transcendental argument, ±° Tucker, Abraham, ±±±, ±°, ±±, µ
and Wordsworth, ±°± Two Dissertations (±·), 
Schelling, F. W. J. von, ±µ, ±µµ, ±µ, ±µ, ±,
±µ, ±, ±·±, ±·, ±·µ, ±·, ±·, ±°, ±, utilitarianism, ·, , °, , ·, , °, ,
±, ±°, ±“µ, ±, °±, °, °, °, ±
°, ±°, ±
Schiller, J. C. F., ±·± Vallins, David, ·°
Schlegel, Friedrich, ±, ±µ, ±· voluntarism
Schneider, Elizabeth,  in Coleridge, ±··, ±·, ±, ±, ±°“°±,
Schopenhauer, Arthur, ±·µ, ±·, ±, µ °, °, °·
secondary qualities, µ, 
Sellars, Wilfrid, ±±, ±± Warton, Joseph, 
sense, inner, µ“,  Wellek, Ren´ , °
e
serpent, ¬gure of, , ±·, ±µ, ±± Wheeler, Kathleen, , ±, , ±·, ±°, °,
Shaffer, Elinor,  ·±
Williams, Bernard, 
Shaftesbury, Third Earl of. See Cooper
Sharpe, William, µ·“µ, ° Williams, Michael, ±µ
Shelley, Percy Bysshe, , ±±, , ±± Willich, A. F. M., ±°, ±±, ±±
Sidney, Philip, “°, ±, , , µ wisdom, , , ±°, ±, °±
Skolimowski, Henry, ·· in Coleridge, ±··, ±°“, °°
Smith, Adam, µµ, · Wittgenstein, Ludwig, °, ±, , , ±, ±°°,
Smith, Norman Kemp,  ±, ±µ, ±
Sosa, Ernest, , ±µ Wolff, Christian, ±
Spinoza, Benedictus de, ±µ, ±·, ±µ, ±·, ±°, Wolff, Robert, ±°
µ Wood, Robert, µ
· Index
Wordsworth, William, ·, , µ, , , ·±“±°, and power, ·“±°±
±°µ, ±°, ±°·, ±±, ±±, ±, ±, ±, ±, and spontaneity, ·, °“µ
±·, °, ± Preface (±±µ), “, “±°±
˜Essay on Morals™,  Preface to Lyrical Ballads, ±°, ±, ·“°,
˜Essay™ (±±µ), ··, · “µ, , ·“°, 
˜The Sublime and the Beautiful™, ·“ ˜Reply to “Mathetes” ™, 
and association, “· The Prelude (±°µ), ·, 
and imagination, ±“
and pleasure, ·“° Young, Edward, µ, µ·, °, , ·, µ
©¤§ µ¤© ©® ®©©
§®  ¬ ¤ ©  
© ¬ ® µ ¬ , University of Oxford
   ® ¤ ¬ , University of Chicago


± Romantic Correspondence: Women, Politics and the Fiction of Letters
   . ¦  
 British Romantic Writers and the East: Anxieties of Empire
® ©§ ¬ ¬ «
 Edmund Burke™s Aesthetic Ideology: Language, Gender and
Political Economy in Revolution
 ¦µ ®© 
 Poetry as an Occupation and an Art in Britain, ±·°“±°
° µ°
µ In the Theatre of Romanticism: Coleridge, Nationalism, Women
µ ¬© .   ¬ ®
 Keats, Narrative and Audience
® ¤ ·   ®®  
· Romance and Revolution: Shelley and the Politics of a Genre
¤ ©¤ ¤ µ¦¦
 Literature, Education, and Romanticism
Reading as Social Practice, ±·°“±
 ¬ ®  ©   ¤  ®
 Women Writing about Money: Women™s Fiction in England, ±·°“±°
¤·¤ °¬®¤
±° Shelley and the Revolution in Taste: The Body and the Natural World
 ©    ®
±± William Cobbett: The Politics of Style
¬ ®  ®    
± The Rise of Supernatural Fiction, ±·“±°°
. .  ¬
± Women Travel Writers and the Language of Aesthetics, ±·±“±±
¬©    .    ¬
± Napoleon and English Romanticism

<< . .

. 29
( : 30)



. . >>